The U.S. Supreme Court was established in the United States Constitution in 1789 and is the highest federal court in the Untied States. “Supreme Dorks” is an unflattering nickname that has been used infrequently since at least 2000.
“That’s why federalism as envisioned would have worked so well IF the Supreme Dorks would not have allowed ‘...regulate interstate commerce’ to mean ‘....regulate anything you feel like’” was cited in June 2000. “The ‘ruling’ that the supreme dorks handed down is a piece of dung” was cited in December 2000.
Wikipedia: Supreme Court of the United States
The Supreme Court of the United States (SCOTUS) is the highest federal court of the United States. Established pursuant to Article III of the United States Constitution in 1789, it has ultimate (and largely discretionary) appellate jurisdiction over all federal courts and over state court cases involving issues of federal law, plus original jurisdiction over a small range of cases. In the legal system of the United States, the Supreme Court is the final interpreter of federal constitutional law, although it may only act within the context of a case in which it has jurisdiction.
The Court consists of the Chief Justice of the United States and eight associate justices who are nominated by the President and confirmed by the Senate. Once appointed, justices have life tenure unless they resign, retire, take senior status, or are removed after impeachment (though no justice has ever been removed).
The Firing Line Forums
Arizona is prepared to Secede !
June 1, 2000, 04:10 PM
We’ll see more and more of this in years to come, and it may even come to pass. The problem is the bigger the federal gov’t gets relative to the state gov’ts (i.e. the more unconstitutional usurpation of power that occurs), the less and less our voice is heard as citizens (due to the ratio of people to legislators becoming so ridiculously high that the legislators are ruled by the media, not us), and therefore the more discontent the people become, as the gov’t laws get out of touch with the various states’ citizens’ values. That’s why federalism as envisioned would have worked so well IF the Supreme Dorks would not have allowed “...regulate interstate commerce” to mean “....regulate anything you feel like”.
Google Groups: alt.music.u2
U2 FANS FOR AL GORE IN 2000!!! (PLEASE READ!!!)
Subversive Saint offers an Olive Branch to Dan Mohr!
Lookie here asshole, i’m old enough to have dumped your mom in the 80’s cause she stinks.
The “ruling” that the supreme dorks handed down is a piece of dung.
What an emotional roller coaster day. First we have the Supreme Dorks ruling against private proptery holders. Now we have this great news that a jury of Americans have finally taken the steps to reclaim our country!
14 posted on 6/23/2005, 9:03:48 PM by FReepaholic (When I read about the evils of drinking, I gave up reading)
Supreme Dorks? Gotta Better Caption? Be Our Guest
Sun Jan 24, 2010 at 14:41:11 PM EST
(Photos of Supreme Court Justices are shown.—ed.)
Supreme Court = Supreme Dorks. How could you let GMA leave?!
1:28 AM - 15 Nov 2011
This ought to be interesting...the Supreme Dorks considering health care reform http://bit.ly/vzbbWB
7:52 AM - 15 Nov 2011
WOW the supreme dorks finally got something right! My question is—how can atheists be so offended about something they don’t think exists? HMMMMMM? Makes you wonder! Maybe they want to control the actions of others sort of like the libs in the white house! Wake Up America!
7 · May 5, 2014 at 10:06am
10:44 am on November 21, 2014
Predictably, that deficit of power spurred the Supreme Dorks in the 1870s to invent an “interest” for the feds in immigration. No wonder Leviathan has triumphed almost completely over our liberty of movement since then.
@FixTheCourt @AlisonFrankel Yes, we the people have lost faith, 17% of voting public in last congressional election,’Supreme Dorks’ nickname
11:18 PM - 3 May 2015
3:59 pm on June 26, 2015
Re: The Gowned Clowns’ Run of More-Blatant-Than-Usual Lunacy
It wasn’t enough for the Supreme Dorks to uphold our enslavement to the medical-insurance conglomerate. Now they’ve tried to redefine “marriage,” too. Funny, I don’t see “lexicography” anywhere in their job-description, no doubt because it’s above their pay-grade. Yo, Bozos: east doesn’t become west nor up down just because you say so.
New York City • Government/Law/Politics/Military • Saturday, June 27, 2015 • Permalink